Five Eyes Free

Ranked on documented facts, not sponsored placement - every provider page shows the evidence.

Short answer: Eight providers in our ranking sit outside the 5/9/14 Eyes alliances - but jurisdiction is one input, not a verdict. Sweden-based Mullvad is 14-Eyes and still court-proven; a Panama letterhead with no evidence buys you nothing.

providers on this page: 13 · independent audit on file: 62% · court-proven no-logs: 0 · open-source apps: 31%

quick picks

  • Swiss jurisdiction with audited no-logs architecture Proton VPN - Switzerland outside all three alliances, Securitum no-logs audit, crypto accepted
  • Gibraltar incorporation, no email required IVPN - Gibraltar jurisdiction, annual audits, account without personal data
  • British Virgin Islands, biggest brand outside the treaties ExpressVPN - BVI incorporation - with Kape ownership as the separate question
#1

IVPN

The anti-affiliate champion candidate holds up: no affiliate program (stated out loud on the homepage), flat honest pricing, quarterly warrant canary, annual…

8
audited canary open source crypto accepted
intro $5/mo
Gibraltar commercial vpn 15 d ago
#2

Cryptostorm

cryptostorm.is is verifiably LIVE (fetched today, HTTP 200) with a PGP-signed warrant canary dated July 1, 2026 and an unbroken Wayback snapshot record…

7.1
watch canary open source crypto accepted watch
intro $6 /month
Iceland commercial vpn 10 d ago
#3

Proton VPN

The most honest mainstream deal in 2026: open-source apps, real audits, a genuinely usable free tier with no data cap, and a transparent renewal model - and in…

6.6
audited open source crypto accepted
intro $3.49/mo renews $83.88 / 12 mo ($6.99/mo)
Switzerland commercial vpn 15 d ago
#4

hide.me

A rare genuinely usable free plan (no card, P2P allowed on the 10 GB free tier) plus audited no-logs claims twice over - DefenseCode 2015 and Securitum 2024…

6.5
audited crypto accepted
intro €2.69/mo (about $3.04/mo)
Malaysia commercial vpn 15 d ago
#5

NymVPN

The only consumer VPN with a real metadata-protection architecture - a 5-hop noise-generating Sphinx mixnet with cover traffic - and it costs just $4/mo on the…

6.2
audit open source crypto accepted
intro $4/mo
Switzerland commercial vpn 15 d ago
#6

Ivacy

Effectively a discontinued brand absorbed by its own competitor: 'Ivacy Powered by PureVPN' no longer sells new Ivacy subscriptions and funnels everything into…

5.5
crypto accepted
intro $1.69 /month
Singapore commercial vpn 17 d ago
#7

Turbo VPN

A 500M-install free VPN from the Qihoo 360-linked developer cluster (Innovative Connecting / Autumn Breeze / Lemon Clove, per TTP 2025 and OTF 2025)…

5.3
yes - ad-supported free tier + premium upsell
Singapore shell free vpn 17 d ago
#8

ExpressVPN

The most expensive VPN in the room wearing the most auditing laurels: $8.33/mo forever after a $2.99 teaser, owned by Kape Technologies (ex-Crossrider adware…

5.1
audited
intro $2.99/mo renews $99.95 / 12 mo ($8.33/mo)
British Virgin Islands commercial vpn 15 d ago
#9

UrbanVPN

The rare VPN where no investigation is needed - the privacy policy is the evidence. Urban VPN's parent self-declares as a data broker and sells behavior…

5.1
free tier remains on the extensions/apps, but the iOS app moved to a subscription + 3-day free trial in 2026 per App Store user reviews - and the 'free' product is funded by data brokerage and advertising
Israel free vpn 17 d ago
#10

CyberGhost

Cheap ($2.19/mo intro on 26 months, renews at $56.94/yr = ~2.2x), Romanian-based, and one of few Kape brands whose no-logs claim is Deloitte-audited - but the…

5
audited
intro $2.19/mo renews $56.94 / 12 mo ($4.75/mo)
Romania commercial vpn 15 d ago
#11

NordVPN

A strong everyday VPN with a huge live-verifiable network (7,287 servers in 150 countries counted in the official API on 2026-10-01) and a genuine audit…

4.5
audited crypto accepted
intro $3.49/mo renews $139.08 / 12 mo ($11.59/mo)
Panama commercial vpn 15 d ago
#12

VPN Proxy Master

The worst documented app in this comparison set: 100M+ installs, ownership in the Qihoo 360-linked shell network (TTP 2025), and a peer-reviewed NDSS 2026…

4.4
no-logs contradicted
yes - ad-supported free tier + premium upsell
Singapore shells free vpn 17 d ago
#13

PureVPN

The cautionary tale of VPN 'no logs' marketing: PureVPN's FBI-log handover in 2017 proved the claim hollow while its policy admitted connection/bandwidth…

3.2
no-logs contradicted audit crypto accepted
intro $2.16/mo renews $47.95 / 12 mo ($4/mo)
Hong Kong commercial vpn 15 d ago

What the alliances actually change for a VPN user

The no-logs evidence ladder Policy text: "we keep no logs" - a promise, not evidence weak Policy-only in practice: impossible for the user to check unproven Independent audit of the specific logging claim - read the scope strong Court test: servers seized or subpoenaed, nothing to hand over strongest evidence countervailing: a real case can flip any class down
Jurisdiction decides what process can reach a provider - evidence decides what they would have to hand over.

The Eyes alliances are intelligence-sharing treaties, not VPN regulations[1]. Their practical relevance to a VPN subscription: a provider seated inside an alliance country receives legal process under that country's courts, and material gathered there can flow to partners without a second proceeding. 100% of the 13 providers in our ranking sit outside all three circles - the filter is about reducing the number of governments with a direct, treaty-based path to the operator.

The company seat versus the server map

Who owns which VPN brand Kape Technologies ExpressVPN CyberGhost PIA ZenMate vpnMentor / WizCase adware past (Crossrider) + owns review sites Nord Security - Surfshark NordVPN Atlas VPN (dead) Surfshark Gen Digital (ex-Norton) Avast VPN AVG Secure HideMyAss IPVanish also: Ziff Davis (IPVanish history, Vipre, CNET)
Follow the corporate seat, not the server dots - ownership and jurisdiction decide where legal process lands.

Marketing pages show server maps; courts read corporate registries. The seats that matter on this page: Switzerland (Proton VPN - GDPR-adjacent, constitutional privacy protections, and a constitutional referendum requirement for handovers), the British Virgin Islands (ExpressVPN - no data-retention statute, but also thin oversight), Gibraltar (IVPN - EU-GDPR framework with a local regulator that publishes)[5], Romania (CyberGhost - no mandatory retention post-2016 court rulings), Panama (NordVPN). Each carries a different flavor of "outside the alliances" - and each provider page records the exact seat.

Where the honest limits are

Three. First, jurisdiction is not evidence: a Panama letterhead does not answer the logging question - the evidence ladder does. Second, treaty alliances are not the only route: law-enforcement cooperation (MLATs, Europol channels) works across all borders, as the takedowns of criminal-use VPNs documented on our incident timeline show. Third, the provider can move: incorporations change hands, and a seat that was outside the alliances last year can be inside a merger next year - the ownership map is the page to re-check before a long subscription.

How we would use this page

Start here only if jurisdiction is a hard requirement for your threat model. Then: Proton VPN is the strongest combination of seat, audit and price transparency; IVPN pairs Gibraltar with the industry's best verification hygiene; ExpressVPN has the biggest network outside the treaties with the Kape ownership question attached[6]. And remember the counter-example we refuse to hide: the most court-proven operator in our ranking sits in a 14-Eyes country, because behavior under pressure beat geography[4].

FAQ

What are the 5, 9 and 14 Eyes exactly?

Signals-intelligence alliances built on the 1946 UKUSA Agreement[2]. Five Eyes: US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand. Nine Eyes adds Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, France. Fourteen Eyes adds Germany, Spain, Italy, Sweden, Belgium. The treaties commit members to share intelligence - they do not create a unified VPN law, but they shape what legal process can reach a provider.

Which providers on this page sit outside the alliances?

13 providers match - Proton VPN (Switzerland), ExpressVPN (British Virgin Islands), NordVPN (Panama), CyberGhost (Romania), hide.me (Malaysia), PureVPN (Hong Kong/BVI), IVPN (Gibraltar) and NymVPN - 100% of the full ranking. Sweden-based Mullvad does not qualify: Sweden joined the 14 Eyes in 2014, and we apply that honestly even though Mullvad is our court-proven benchmark.

Does the server location matter instead?

No - and this is the most common confusion. Legal process follows the operating company, not the data center. A provider incorporated in Panama that rents servers in Frankfurt can be pressured through its corporate seat, its payment processors, and its staff - none of which are in Panama. Judge the company's seat, then the evidence of how it behaves when asked.

Is Sweden really a problem for Mullvad?

Sweden is 14 Eyes, and that is a knock - but Mullvad is also the operator whose 2023 police raid produced nothing, with the warrant documented[4]. Jurisdiction describes what can be requested; architecture and evidence decide what can be handed over. We publish both facts and let you weight them.

Is an offshore jurisdiction always good?

No. Some "privacy-friendly" seats are paper shells with weak courts, no data-protection law, and no press that would ever notice a handover. A jurisdiction is a promise about process - it is only as good as the transparency that backs it. GDPR jurisdictions give you a regulator and complaint rights; tax havens give you a flag on a website.

How should I combine jurisdiction with the other criteria?

As a filter, not a score. Pick your acceptable jurisdictions, then rank the survivors on evidence class - the no-logs hub and court-proven hub - and on renewal price. A provider that wins on jurisdiction but has zero evidence and a steep renewal jump is not the answer.