Lantern (Brave New Software)
A censorship-unblocking tool that now wears nonprofit clothes: Lantern's parent became the 501(c)(3) Brave New Software Project and the site now reads like a…
Tor, circumvention tools and other ways to move traffic that are not VPNs at all.
Short answer: Thirteen tools are tracked in our research - Tor for anonymity, Psiphon and Lantern for censorship, Snowflake for bridging, encrypted DNS for metadata; the ones that pass the publication gate rank below. None replaces a VPN; most pair with one.
providers on this page: 10 · independent audit on file: 10% · court-proven no-logs: 0 · open-source apps: 100%
quick picks
A censorship-unblocking tool that now wears nonprofit clothes: Lantern's parent became the 501(c)(3) Brave New Software Project and the site now reads like a…
A DNS-layer filtering service that has grown up in public: born January-April 2021 out of the Windscribe team (same three founders, spun out precisely because…
Hysteria 2 is not a VPN provider - it is free, MIT-licensed proxy software you deploy on your own server, and this dossier treats it that way: there is no…
The mainstream default of DNS-level filtering, with a genuinely honest scoping the operator itself states plainly: AdGuard DNS sits at the resolver - it…
The reference point for anonymity - but not a VPN, and this dossier is honest about that. Tor is a US-registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit (2006, born from mid-1990s…
I2P is a genuinely different thing from a VPN and should never be bought as one: it is a free, decentralized garlic-routing network optimized for services…
The current state of the art in self-hosted censorship circumvention, and the reason 'buy a VPN' no longer has one right answer for people behind serious…
The strongest case on this site for 'sometimes the answer is a DNS blocker, not a VPN' - and a product whose limits the operator itself does not oversell…
A transparency-first circumvention tool, not a privacy VPN - and it says so itself ('If you require anonymity over the Internet then you should use Tor instead…
Snowflake is a bridge, not a tool you 'use' the way you use a VPN: it is the Tor Project's pluggable transport that smuggles Tor connections past censors by…
Thirteen tools fill the space a VPN does not cover - anonymity (Tor, I2P[1][4]), censorship (Psiphon, Lantern, Hiddify, the Reality stack[2][5][6][7]), DNS hygiene (NextDNS, AdGuard, Pi-hole[8]), bridging (Snowflake[3]) and ecosystem routing (Private Relay). None replaces a VPN; several beat one at their specific job.
Tor's three-relay design gives you what no VPN can: the destination sees a shared exit, the relay chain hides your origin, and no single operator holds both your identity and your traffic[1]. The costs are speed, exit-node trust for non-HTTPS traffic, and hostile-exit nuisance. A VPN is faster, covers your whole system, and trades all of that for trusting one operator - which is why the operator's evidence class (the no-logs hub) is the whole ballgame in the commercial lane.
For censored networks the stack reads bottom-up: encrypted DNS is trivially blocked; plain VPN protocols are fingerprinted (the China hub documents the detection methods); the Reality/Hysteria class of tools borrows legitimate TLS shapes and survives longer[5][6]; Snowflake and Tor bridges are the last-resort lane[3]. Psiphon and Lantern wrap several of these techniques with funding and infrastructure for the users who need them most[2][9].
Two rules keep the stack honest. One: each layer answers a different adversary - DNS tools against trackers, VPNs against local network observation, Tor against destination-side profiling - and no single tool spans all three. Two: layering has failure modes (DNS below a tunnel that does not route it, VPN-then-Tor versus Tor-then-VPN), which is why the alternatives guide and the leak test exist. The tools are lego bricks; the threat model decides the order[1][2][8].
First, the DNS detour: a tunnel that does not route DNS leaves the resolver visible, and the resolver leaks every destination - the most common broken stack, and the reason DNS tools sit below the tunnel layer[8][1]. Second, the partial-coverage illusion: a browser-only proxy plus a system full of apps is a lock on one window of a house, which is the browser lane's defining flaw and the reason this page's two products sit below the commercial gate. Tool lanes reward precision about adversaries; Both failures come from imprecision about which layer was supposed to cover what - write the layer list down, test it, and most stacks assemble correctly on the first try.
Thirteen - Tor, Psiphon, Lantern, Snowflake, iCloud Private Relay, I2P, Xray/Reality, Hysteria2, Hiddify, NextDNS, AdGuard DNS, Pi-hole and Control D[1][2][6]. They solve different problems: anonymity (Tor, I2P), censorship (Psiphon, Lantern, Hiddify, the Reality stack), DNS hygiene (NextDNS, AdGuard, Pi-hole), and Apple-ecosystem routing (Private Relay).
No - it is a different guarantee. Tor routes through three volunteer relays and gives real anonymity from destination sites, at a speed cost no commercial VPN matches[1]. A VPN moves trust from your ISP to one operator with an account attached. The strong pattern is layering - VPN inside the daily system, Tor for the sessions that need anonymity - not choosing one.
Open-protocol censorship tooling rather than VPNs: Reality borrows a real TLS handshake so censors see an ordinary HTTPS connection[5]; Hysteria is a QUIC-based proxy tuned for lossy, throttled networks[6]; Hiddify packages that stack into a client[7]. The China hub covers when these beat commercial VPN obfuscation.
They add DNS hygiene - encrypted resolution, ad and tracker filtering, custom blocklists[8] - which is real but narrow. DNS is one leak of many; a tool lane member cannot encrypt your traffic. The correct mental model: DNS tools below a VPN, never instead of one. Mullvad's own resolver shutdown note[1] is a good primer on how much DNS topology matters.
Apple's two-hop proxy for Safari traffic and unsecured HTTP - it hides your IP from websites and your DNS from Apple, but only inside the Apple ecosystem, only in Safari and Mail, with Apple and Cloudflare as the two trusted parties. It is a partial VPN for the Apple monoculture, not a cross-platform privacy tool.
The gate again - our ranking requires dated, verifiable accountability evidence per provider, and these tools are projects and protocols rather than accountable subscription operators[9]. The evidence they do publish (Tor's design docs, Snowflake's stats, Psiphon's transparency reports) is good - the alternatives guide weighs it against commercial options directly.