Mullvad VPN
The most honest VPN on the internet, and in 2026 still the one this industry is measured against: numbered accounts, cash or Monero accepted, open-source client
CIS-market provider; ownership opaque (RU/UA ties disputed); avoid without re-verification.
by the vpncomparison editorial desk · review version 2 · prose updated 2026-09-28 · facts as of 2026-09-28 · how we verify
HideMy.name is a commercial VPN service targeting the CIS market, but its ownership and legal base are unclear, with disputed ties to Russia and Ukraine. The provider lacks verified details on pricing, logging policy, jurisdiction, or core features. Given the absence of verifiable claims and transparency, you should avoid this service until it undergoes independent re-verification.
HideMy.name makes no public logging claim, and there is zero evidence - no audits, warrant canary, or jurisdictional clarity - to assess its privacy posture. Without even a basic privacy policy or third-party verification, the logging status is entirely unknown. This lack of transparency means you must assume activity or connection data could be retained, with no legal or technical safeguards confirmed.
No pricing information is available for HideMy.name, including introductory or renewal rates, contract length, or refund window. There is no data on payment methods, subscription tiers, or minimum cost. Due to this opacity, the renewal trap - where initial discounts hide steep long-term costs - cannot be evaluated but remains a significant risk.
The provider lists no confirmed protocols, obfuscation, kill switch, multihop, or support for P2P and streaming. Server count, countries served, and device support are all unreported. There is no evidence of open-source apps or tested performance. Without verified features or independent testing, you cannot rely on HideMy.name for secure browsing, leak protection, or connectivity needs.
Ownership of HideMy.name is not disclosed, with no verifiable operator entity or corporate history. No incidents, red flags, or third-party voices are documented, but the lack of transparency itself is a major concern. Given the disputed RU/UA affiliations and absence of accountability, the provider’s trustworthiness cannot be established under current reporting.
HideMy.name offers no known obfuscation methods like Shadowsocks or obfs4, and there is no evidence it works in highly censored regions such as China, Iran, or Russia. Without tested tools to bypass deep packet inspection, this service is not suitable for users facing state-level censorship who require reliable access to blocked content.
Avoid HideMy.name until it publishes audited no-logs proof, ownership details, and basic service terms. The complete lack of verifiable data makes it impossible to trust. There is no indication this provider pays for reviews, but the absence of an affiliate program or transparency means you’re navigating blind - better options exist.
| Intro price | see provider site |
|---|
See the 3-year total next to the marketing number: true-cost calculator →
affiliate status not verified yet
If we sign up for this program, every link here becomes rel="nofollow sponsored" and this box stays. Until then our links are plain redirects with zero tracking. Ranking logic physically cannot read affiliate fields - here is the proof.
Before you pay: check the renewal price, the refund window, and whether a cheaper or free path covers your use case - the honest checklist.
Based on our checks as of 2026-09-28: HideMy.name scores 4.9/10 in our weighted review. We logged no red flags. User reports, ownership and the incident record are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.
Unknown. No verified details on servers, speeds, apps, or features are available. You’d be paying for a service with no public specifications or guarantees.
Pricing data is missing, so the renewal cost and long-term total are unknown. This opacity makes financial risk impossible to assess.
There is no logging claim and zero evidence - no audits, jurisdictional analysis, or court-tested history. Logging practices are entirely unverified.
No. HideMy.name lacks obfuscation tools and has no proven ability to bypass state-level firewalls. Do not rely on it in heavily censored regions.
Unknown. Payment methods and signup requirements, including KYC or anonymous options, are not disclosed.
With no warrant canary, transparency report, or incident history, you’d likely receive no public notice of compromise or closure.
Consider Proton VPN’s free tier (Swiss-based, audited, open-source) or Mullvad (flat-priced, privacy-first, independently audited) - both are transparent and trustworthy.
The most honest VPN on the internet, and in 2026 still the one this industry is measured against: numbered accounts, cash or Monero accepted, open-source client
The anti-affiliate champion candidate holds up: no affiliate program (stated out loud on the homepage), flat honest pricing, quarterly warrant canary, annual th
The best-evidenced no-logs claim in the business - twice tested in US courts (2016, 2018) and twice found to have nothing - plus the cheapest long-term renewal
No comments yet - be the first. Posting runs a short proof-of-work in your browser (anti-spam), no account needed.