A text-book ad-funded freemium trap that has quietly become an in-house brand of the least trustworthy conglomerate in consumer VPNs. The app works and is fast for a free product (Tom's Guide measured 52 Mbps on a 100 Mbps line; vpnMentor measured small download losses), it needs no signup on the free tier, and it unblocks at least one streaming service. Everything else points the wrong way: the free tier pays for itself with personalized advertising through named SDKs (Unity Ads, Ironsource, Kochava, Google Publisher) whose data practices the operator admits may constitute a 'sale' under California law - while the Google Play data-safety panel claims 'No data shared with third parties' and the App Store blurb claims TouchVPN 'never tracks, logs, or stores your... IP address' against Apple's own tracking label and an Aura notice that logs domains (anonymized), bandwidth, session durations and device hashes 'for analytics and marketing purposes'. There is no independent audit, the encryption story is thin (SSL/proxy-style, undisclosed on Windows, no forward secrecy), the kill-switch story changes by reviewer and platform, and the operator's own site cannot keep its country count straight (80+ vs 90+ vs 30+). The ownership chain is the decisive fact: Touch VPN's terms say 'We are a division of the Pango Group'; its privacy policy names VPN Proxy Pro, LLC at the same 250 Northern Ave, Boston address as the TotalAV group; and since December 2024 that group is Point Wild - owner of TotalAV, Hotspot Shield, Betternet, UltraAV and of the review site Comparitech, which reviews Touch VPN's category while sitting in the same group. The terms' refund section reserves discretion to deny 'any refund request... for any or no reason'. As a disposable geo-unblocker with ads it does what it says; as a privacy product it is documented as the opposite.
no-logs contradicted6 red flagsfacts verified - touchvpn.net (homepage, privacy-policy.html, general-terms-and-conditions), Google Play listing com.northghost.touchvpn, Apple App Store listing id991744383, Aura's VPN Products Privacy Notice on aura.com, PRNewswire Point Wild merger release, Comparitech 100+ VPN logging-policies article, Tom's Guide and vpnMentor Touch VPN reviews, Top10VPN Free VPN Risk Index and free-VPN investigations hub, the Open Technology Fund VPN transparency report page, the HN Algolia API and six arctic-shift Reddit thread pulls all fetched live 2026-11-03. Note: arctic-shift body-text and title search endpoints returned 422 all session (known failure mode), so Reddit voices were gathered via thread (link_id) endpoints after locating thread IDs by websearch. HN has effectively no discussion of this product (1 quoted-phrase hit, for a different brand - see below).
group ownership with review-site conflict: the terms state 'We are a division of the Pango Group'; the December 2024 Pango-Total Security merger created Point Wild, whose brands include TotalAV, Hotspot Shield, UltraAV, Betternet and 'Comparitech and more' (PRNewswire release fetched 2026-11-03) - i.e. a VPN review site sits inside the same group as this VPN; Comparitech independently describes Touch VPN as having 'shared a privacy policy with other Aura-owned VPNs' in the past and rates its logging 2/5 (Comparitech page fetched 2026-11-03; Comparitech's Pango ownership per UK Companies House PSC records is documented in the project's review_sites.json)
ad-tracking data collection on free users: personalized ads via four named SDKs, device advertising IDs and IP addresses shared with ad networks, CCPA 'sale' admission - vs the Play Store data-safety claim of no third-party sharing and the App Store claim that TouchVPN 'never tracks'
white-label network lineage: the Android package com.northghost.touchvpn preserves 'North Ghost', the original AnchorFree name behind Hotspot Shield; Tom's Guide reports Touch VPN 'uses the same high-quality servers as Hotspot Shield and other Pango group VPNs'; Comparitech notes the shared Aura privacy policy history - the product is a storefront on group infrastructure, not an independent network
+3 more red flags - expand before signing up
refunds at operator discretion: terms 3.15 - 'All refunds are issued at Our sole discretion and any refund request may be denied for any or no reason'; vpnMentor's reviewer could not get support to even find his signup record when asking about the 45-day money-back guarantee
internal documentation chaos: homepage heading '80+ Countries' vs body '90+ countries' vs '30+' elsewhere; kill-switch availability differs by reviewer and platform; the policy's own usage-information section references 'UltraAV web pages' - a copy-paste from a sibling brand; support staff could not state the server count (vpnMentor)
name-collision hazard: a different 'Touch VPN - Stable & Secure' app by Yolo Mobile Technology was flagged 'Concerning and suspicious' in the 2025 Open Technology Fund VPN transparency analysis (see the OTF source) - community complaints about 'Touch VPN' can refer to either product; this dossier covers only the Pango/Point Wild product on com.northghost.touchvpn / TouchVPN Inc
Review
draft generated by Qwen3, fact-checked by the vpncomparison editorial desk · review version 2 · prose updated 2026-11-03 · facts as of 2026-11-03 · how we verify
Honesty note: we have not run our own tests on Touch VPN - Fast Hotspot Proxy yet (leak tests, speed, kill switch). Everything on this page is source-based meta-research with dated links. When we test it, results appear here and on the change log.
Overview
Touch VPN is a freemium, ad-supported mobile-first VPN app operated by VPN Proxy Pro, LLC - a division of the Pango Group, now part of Point Wild, a Boston-based conglomerate that also owns Hotspot Shield, Betternet, TotalAV, and the review site Comparitech. Despite branding itself as privacy-focused, it contradicts its own no-logs claims through documented data collection for ads and analytics. This is not an independent privacy tool but a storefront on a shared network with deep conflicts of interest.
Logging & privacy
Touch VPN claims it “does not log any information that associates your account credentials or identity with your VPN session activity” and that it “never tracks, logs, or stores your personally identifiable information or your IP address.” However, its own privacy policy and the group-level Aura VPN Products Privacy Notice contradict this: it logs session duration, bandwidth used, anonymized domain visits, device hashes, and your real IP address at connection start (encrypted, deleted at session end). It shares device advertising IDs, IP addresses, and device details with ad SDKs (Unity Ads, Ironsource, Kochava, Google Publisher), admits this may constitute a “sale” under CCPA, and uses data for analytics and marketing. Apple’s App Privacy label confirms data is used to track you. The logging claim is rated 2/5 by Comparitech (connection logs: yes, IP logs: yes) and is classified as contradicted - not audit-verified or court-tested. No warrant canary exists.
Pricing & the renewal trap
Touch VPN offers a free tier with a 500 MB/day data cap, pop-up ads, and limited server access. Premium pricing is $12.99/month or $79.99/year, with no documented renewal rate - only that it appears in your account dashboard at renewal. The renewal ratio and renewal_monthly_equivalent are null due to lack of published data, making long-term costs unpredictable. Refunds are allowed within 45 days but are granted at the operator’s sole discretion - vpnMentor’s reviewer couldn’t even locate their account when requesting one. There is no multi-year discount structure, and the three_year_cash_total is null, meaning the total cost over three years is unknown and potentially higher. Payment is via card or app-store billing; crypto is not accepted.
Features & performance
Touch VPN supports OpenVPN, Catapult Hydra (Pango’s proprietary protocol), and WireGuard (per Tom’s Guide). It offers a kill switch (though availability varies by platform - Tom’s Guide notes it’s absent on Windows/Mac) and split tunneling (premium only). It supports P2P on all servers (per support, per vpnMentor), but no multihop, Tor over VPN, or dedicated IP. It claims 5,900 servers in 90+ countries across Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Fire TV, and Apple TV. However, server count discrepancies exist (80+ vs 90+ vs 30+), and support couldn’t confirm the number. It unblocks at least Netflix (Tom’s Guide) and ITV Hub (vpnMentor), but not BBC iPlayer, Hulu, or Disney+. No independent performance tests are available, but Tom’s Guide recorded 52 Mbps on a 100 Mbps line.
Ownership & track record
Touch VPN is owned by Point Wild (via Aura/Point Wild), a $600M-revenue conglomerate formed in December 2024 from the merger of Pango Group and Total Security. Its brands include TotalAV, Hotspot Shield, Betternet, UltraAV, and Comparitech - the very site that reviews Touch VPN’s category. This creates a structural conflict: the operator owns a trusted review platform. The Android package name (com.northghost.touchvpn) traces back to AnchorFree, the original Hotspot Shield company. Red flags include ad SDK data sharing, contradictory privacy claims, internal documentation errors (e.g., referencing “UltraAV” in its policy), and refund denials at operator discretion. Reddit users call it “sketchy as hell,” report Avast flagging its Chrome extension as phishing, and associate it with poor security practices.
Censorship resistance
Touch VPN documents no obfuscation methods. It does not claim to work in high-censorship environments like China, Iran, or Russia. Its protocols (OpenVPN, Catapult Hydra, WireGuard) are not masked, and no obfuscation features are listed in its apps or documentation. Given its ad-tracking infrastructure and lack of stealth, this tool is NOT suitable for use in censored networks. Users in such regions should consider providers with proven obfuscation (e.g., Shadowsocks, Camouflage Mode, or proprietary stealth protocols).
Verdict
Avoid Touch VPN for privacy, anonymity, or security. It logs connection data, shares device and IP information with ad networks, and operates under a conglomerate that owns both the product and a review site - creating an unresolvable conflict. The free tier works as a disposable geo-unblocker with ads, but the premium tier charges ExpressVPN prices for inferior features and transparency. The money trail leads to Point Wild, which profits from both your data and your trust - while paying no review sites directly, it owns one.
++ What holds up
Genuinely free with no signup required and respectable speeds for a free tier - 52 Mbps download on a 100 Mbps line in Tom's Guide's testing; vpnMentor measured only 5-9% download loss on most servers
Android app updated regularly (Oct 23, 2026) and well liked at retail scale: ~830K Play reviews at 4.3-4.5 stars, 50M+ installs
Passed DNS/IP leak tests in both fetched reviews (Tom's Guide 'no leaks' in Top10VPN's 2019 testing; vpnMentor's leak tests clean)
Netflix US unblocked in Tom's Guide's 2024 streaming tests
-- What to watch
Free tier is funded by personalized advertising: the policy names Unity Ads, Ironsource, Kochava and Google Publisher SDKs receiving advertising IDs, IP address and device data, admits some ads are personalized and that under CCPA this 'may be deemed a sale' - while the Play data-safety panel claims 'No data shared with third parties'
Store-listing logging claim ('never tracks, logs, or stores your... IP address') is contradicted by the operator's own Aura VPN notice (domain logging on an anonymized basis, bandwidth and session logs to 'enforce free app usage limits', device hashes used for 'analytics and marketing purposes') and by Apple's 'Data Used to Track You' label
No independent security or no-logs audit of Touch VPN exists; Pango's 2023 AON audit covered Hotspot Shield and it is 'unclear if other members of the Pango group such as Touch VPN were included' (Tom's Guide)
Thin security engineering: SSL/proxy-style encryption with no perfect forward secrecy (vpnMentor), Windows protocol locked and Windows encryption undisclosed (Tom's Guide), kill switch absent on Windows/macOS per Tom's Guide and 'no kill switch' per vpnMentor's text
Aggressive upsell: 500 MB/day cap, few locations and 'invasive'/'incredibly annoying' pop-up ads on the free tier (both reviews); premium costs $12.99/mo or $79.99/yr - ExpressVPN-level pricing for a barebones service
Operator opacity: touchvpn.net publishes no pricing page, the terms reserve refunds 'at Our sole discretion... denied for any or no reason', and the privacy policy contains a copy-paste artifact referencing 'UltraAV web pages' - a sibling brand
2007-era Top10VPN Risk Index entry for the app flagged intrusive permissions (READ_PHONE_STATE, ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE) and one major network abnormality
Pricing reality check
Intro price
$12.99 /mo
Refund window
45 days
Notes
Free tier with ads plus an ad-free premium. Premium prices appear only in the app stores and reviews, never on touchvpn.net (the site has no pricing page): $12.99/month or $79.99/year (App Store in-app-purchase metadata via search index; Tom's Guide and vpnMentor reviews fetched 2026-11-03 quote the same ladder). The operator's terms say the Subscription Fee is 'identified, in U.S. dollars, at the time of enrollment' and renewals charge 'the Renewal Price shown in your account dashboard' - no renewal rate is published anywhere fetchable.
Check the renewal price above before any multi-year plan - true-cost calculator.
Is Touch VPN - Fast Hotspot Proxy legit?
Touch VPN - Fast Hotspot Proxy is operated by aura-point-wild. Logging claim: Touch VPN privacy policy (last updated Oct 31, 2024, fetched 2026-11-03): 'Our VPN Products do not log any information that associates your account credentials or identity with your VPN session activity. We do not maintain any records that show what websites you were browsing or apps accessed through a VPN connection.' App Store listing blurb goes further: 'TouchVPN never tracks, logs, or stores your personally identifiable information or your IP address.' - evidence class: CLAIM CONTRADICTED. No incidents on file in our research - absence of evidence is not proof of innocence. Facts verified - touchvpn.net (homepage, privacy-policy.html, general-terms-and-conditions), Google Play listing com.northghost.touchvpn, Apple App Store listing id991744383, Aura's VPN Products Privacy Notice on aura.com, PRNewswire Point Wild merger release, Comparitech 100+ VPN logging-policies article, Tom's Guide and vpnMentor Touch VPN reviews, Top10VPN Free VPN Risk Index and free-VPN investigations hub, the Open Technology Fund VPN transparency report page, the HN Algolia API and six arctic-shift Reddit thread pulls all fetched live 2026-11-03. Note: arctic-shift body-text and title search endpoints returned 422 all session (known failure mode), so Reddit voices were gathered via thread (link_id) endpoints after locating thread IDs by websearch. HN has effectively no discussion of this product (1 quoted-phrase hit, for a different brand - see below). (not fully verified) as of 2026-11-03 - read the sources below.
The money trail - what review sites earn by recommending this
affiliate status not verified yet
If we sign up for this program, every link here becomes rel="nofollow sponsored" and routes through /go/. Until then our links point straight to the provider's website with zero tracking. Ranking logic physically cannot read affiliate fields - here is the proof.
Touch VPN - Fast Hotspot Proxy FAQ
Is Touch VPN - Fast Hotspot Proxy legit?
Based on our checks as of 2026-11-03: Touch VPN - Fast Hotspot Proxy scores 3/10 in our weighted review. We logged 6 red flags (listed above). Its logging claim has been contradicted in a documented case - treat "no logs" marketing as marketing. User reports, ownership and the incident record are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.
What do you actually get with Touch VPN?
A freemium app with 500 MB/day, ads, and limited locations on the free tier; premium removes ads, lifts the cap, and unlocks more servers. No audit, weak encryption on Windows, inconsistent kill switch, and no obfuscation. You get a product built on shared infrastructure with Hotspot Shield, not an independent privacy service.
What is the renewal price and total cost over three years?
The renewal price is not published - only that it appears in your account dashboard. The **`renewal_monthly_equivalent`** and **`renewal_ratio`** are **null**, and the **`three_year_cash_total`** is **null**. The total cost over three years is unknown and could exceed the initial pricing with no transparency.
What evidence supports Touch VPN’s no-logs claim?
None - its logging claim is **contradicted** by its own documents. It logs session duration, bandwidth, anonymized domains, device hashes, and your IP at connection start. Ad SDKs collect IP and device IDs, and Apple’s privacy label confirms data is used to track you. No independent audit covers Touch VPN.
Does Touch VPN work in censored countries like China or Iran?
No. It has **no documented obfuscation methods** and does not claim to bypass deep packet inspection. Its protocols are standard and unmasked. This tool is not designed for, nor capable of, operating in high-censorship environments.
Can you pay for Touch VPN anonymously?
No. The free tier requires no account, but premium requires email signup and payment via credit card or app-store billing (Apple/Google), which are not anonymous. Cryptocurrency is not accepted, and while no KYC is enforced, your payment method ties your identity to the subscription.
What happens if Touch VPN shuts down or gets compromised?
You lose access to its servers and unblocking features. Given its history of data collection and ad SDKs, a breach could expose device hashes, IP addresses, session data, and browsing domains. The operator’s terms allow unilateral service changes and refund denials - users have no recourse.
What’s an honest free or cheap alternative?
Proton VPN’s free tier offers unlimited data, no ads, no logs, and strong encryption - audited and based in Switzerland. For paid options, Mullvad (flat €5/month, anonymous accounts) or IVPN (independent, audited, transparent) are better privacy investments. Avoid ad-funded freemium models - they always monetize your data.
The meta-review: what the internet says about Touch VPN - Fast Hotspot Proxy
We do not expect you to trust us. This review is a meta-review: below you see what other review sites claim - with their conflicts of interest labeled - what users report on Reddit and forums, and who actually operates Touch VPN - Fast Hotspot Proxy. Every claim links to its source so you can verify it yourself.
What other reviewers say (4)
Every source carries a conflict label from our review-site database. "Affiliate-funded" means the site earns money if you buy what it recommends. We include critical voices deliberately.
Fetched 2026-11-03 (affiliate-funded site, Future plc): 500 MB/day free cap; premium $12.99/mo or $79.99/yr - 'comparable to leading VPNs like ExpressVPN, despite offering far fewer features'; invasive pop-up ads; no third-party audit ('Pango has commissioned an audit on Hotspot Shield from AON in 2023... unclear if other members of the Pango group such as Touch VPN were included'); kill switch 'not for Windows or MacOS'; split tunneling paid only; protocols OpenVPN, Catapult Hydra and WireGuard; Windows encryption undisclosed; 52.36 Mbps download on a 100 Mbps line; Netflix only for streaming; spec table lists Linux GUI, Fire TV, Apple TV, PS, Xbox; explicitly notes the app 'uses the same high-quality servers as Hotspot Shield and other Pango group VPNs'.
Fetched 2026-11-03 (score 4.8/10, ranked 134 of 195; the site discloses Kape Technologies ownership and affiliate commissions - its own conflict): 'a very real chance it's not safe to use at all'; 'Touch VPN logs a lot of your data' - OS versions, ISP name, diagnostics, approximate location, bandwidth, browser type, device identifiers; notes ownership 'by Aura and Pango, which own other VPNs that are known for logging - like Betternet and Hotspot Shield'; SSL-only encryption with traffic decrypted/re-encrypted at the proxy, no perfect forward secrecy, 'no kill switch' in its text (table says yes - internally inconsistent); free tier: 21 locations on Android, 7 on Chrome, 2 on Edge, no account needed; 5900 servers/90 countries vs the site's own '30+' - support could not confirm the count; only ITV Hub unblocked (Netflix, BBC iPlayer, Hulu, HBO Max, Prime, Disney+ blocked); support confirmed all servers allow P2P while the summary table says torrenting 'No'; 45-day money-back per support, but support could not find the reviewer's signup record.
Fetched 2026-11-03: Touch VPN (USA) rated 2/5 - 'Traffic Logs: No; Connection logs: Yes; IP address logs: Yes; Advertising ID: Yes'. 'In the past, Touch VPN shared a privacy policy with other Aura-owned VPNs. It now has its own policy. Touch VPN's new privacy policy states it may collect your mobile advertising ID, connection timestamps, bandwidth used, server locations you connected to, IP address and location information based on IP address. It does not log websites or apps you use while connected.' Note the structural conflict: Comparitech has been owned by AnchorFree/Pango since Oct 2021 (UK Companies House PSC per review_sites.json) and is now a Point Wild brand alongside Touch VPN.
Corroborated via live websearch snippets on 2026-11-03 (page not fully fetched this session, listed for transparency): '$12.99' premium; 'Given the lack of features and relatively high price (Private Internet Access goes for just $1.33 / month and offers far more), it's hard for me to recommend Touch VPN's premium offer'; 'No Paid Plan Option for Windows' noted in the heading. Affiliate-funded site (per review_sites.json).
What users say (6)
Reddit, forums, HN - paraphrased and linked, never quoted out of context. Anecdotes, not proof - but refund complaints and leak reports are the best early-warning system this market has.
Fetched 2026-11-03: exactly one comment hit for the quoted phrase - in the OTF VPN-transparency thread, referring to Yolo Mobile Technology's different 'Touch VPN - Stable & Secure' app, listed under 'Concerning and suspicious findings (users should avoid)'. A companion search for unquoted 'touchvpn' returns only substring noise ('touchpad', 'touching'). Hacker News has never substantively discussed the Pango Touch VPN - a silence that is itself the finding.
Fetched 2026-11-03 (HTTP 200): OP and multiple replies report Avast/AVG flagging 'URL:Phishing' on the Touch VPN extension across Chrome, Vivaldi and other browsers through 2024; one user calls the VPN 'sketchy as hell' and uses Mullvad; one switches to a paid VPN suspecting a compromised update; one says free VPNs 'make money with your information'; one dissents with a VirusTotal-based false-positive argument.
Fetched 2026-11-03 (HTTP 200): user installs the Touch VPN Chrome extension unknowingly, panics about data theft and uninstalls within minutes; a replier explains Chrome extensions cannot touch the file system - a small thread but representative of the brand's reputation among technical users.
Fetched 2026-11-03 (HTTP 200): the general free-VPN verdict - 'If it's free, you are the product' (top comment, 11 points), 'Simple answer. No.' (34 points), and one 7-point mixed voice defending TouchVPN/Hotspot Shield for users who isolate them in Firefox containers, conceding 'It's true they collect information about you and your hardware'.
Fetched 2026-11-03 (HTTP 200, three thread pulls): r/firefox OP blames the Touch VPN extension for browser slowdown, and the quoted remediation page (thebestvpn.com) was itself blocked by Firefox as a potential security threat; r/developersIndia OP lists Touch VPN as his current extension while asking for something secure, with replies recommending Proton VPN free; r/FitGirlRepack reply 'Any vpn is safe' shows the casual-piracy user profile.
Fetched 2026-11-03: body-text search returned HTTP 422 (and the posts title-search endpoint likewise) - the known rate-limit failure mode documented in sibling dossiers. All Reddit voices in this dossier were instead pulled through thread (link_id) endpoints after locating threads via websearch; none were taken from the failed body-search path.
Who is behind Touch VPN - Fast Hotspot Proxy?
VPN ownership is often deliberately layered through shell companies. This is what we could verify - with sources. Confidence: confirmed (checked 2026-09-29).
Generated by Qwen3 on 2026-11-03 from our fact database plus the linked sources. It summarizes - it does not add facts. Check anything that matters against the linked sources.
Bottom line: Touch VPN is a freemium ad-supported app with a 500 MB/day free tier, pop-up ads, and limited server access. It works for basic geo-unblocking and is fast for a free product, but it is not a privacy tool. The premium tier costs $12.99/month or $79.99/year - pricing comparable to top-tier services despite offering far fewer features and weaker privacy protections.
The logging truth: The provider claims “no logs” of browsing activity, but its own privacy policy and group-level documents confirm logging of session duration, bandwidth, device hashes, domain-level browsing data (anonymized), and IP addresses at session start. Ad SDKs (Unity Ads, Ironsource, Kochava, Google Publisher) collect IP addresses, device IDs, and usage data, with the operator admitting this may constitute a “sale” under CCPA. Jurisdiction is the United States, with operations tied to VPN Proxy Pro, LLC in Boston, MA.
Pricing reality: The free tier is ad-heavy and data-capped. Premium pricing starts at $12.99/month or $79.99/year - high for the features offered - with no published renewal rates. Refunds are at the operator’s sole discretion and may be denied for any reason, including inability to locate user accounts. No pricing is listed on the website; all details appear only in app stores.
What reviewers say vs what users say: Affiliate reviewers (Tom’s Guide, vpnMentor) call it overpriced and poorly secured, with inconsistent kill-switch support and weak encryption. Independent voices on Reddit consistently label it “sketchy as hell,” report antivirus phishing alerts on its Chrome extension, and treat it as a default example of risky free-VPN economics. The Google Play data-safety claim of “no data shared” directly contradicts the privacy policy’s admission of ad-network data sharing.
Who runs it: Touch VPN is operated by VPN Proxy Pro, LLC, a division of the Pango Group, now part of Point Wild - a conglomerate that also owns Hotspot Shield, Betternet, TotalAV, and the review site Comparitech. This creates a direct conflict of interest, as Comparitech rates Touch VPN while being under the same corporate umbrella. The Android package retains the legacy “North Ghost” name from its AnchorFree origins.
Sources & how this review was built
Every external source used on this page, with the date we fetched it and its evidence class [A]-[D] (A = primary/operator, B = serious press/research, C = community, D = our own measurements). Methodology: how we verify. Sources disappear or change - if a link is dead, tell us via contact.
Evidence classes on this page:[A] A: 6[B] B: 9[C] C: 6[D] D: 0(D stays empty until our own test phase)
A heavyweight free-mobile VPN from a Singapore entity with real strengths on paper - no account required, an unusually deep protocol lineup, a self-published…
auditcrypto accepted
intro $2.99 /mo
Singapore - LIGHTNINGLINK NETWORKS PTE. LTD. (own privacy policy and both app-store listings; Play developer address 8 Marina View #43-01 Asia Square Tower 1, Singapore 018960). Note: 2026 reviews still describe the operator as 'Free Connected Ltd., a private company based in Hong Kong' (Security.org) and 'Based in Hong Kong' (Cloudwards), while the operator's own live documents say Singapore - the entity migration is documented but the current corporate history is not publishedfree vpn 9 d ago
The most trustworthy free VPN on structural grounds: an anarchist Seattle collective that has run since 1999, funds itself by donations, asks no account…
VPN Gate is a legitimate, transparently-run academic experiment that is genuinely free forever and genuinely useful for one thing: getting past government…
auditopen source
intro $0 /mo
Japan - web site hosted at the University of Tsukuba campus (Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573), administrator Daiyuu Nobori, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Tsukuba; the volunteer relays themselves are distributed worldwide and 'are not placed in the campus'; aggregated log servers are owned and managed by SoftEther Corporation, the joint research partner (about_us.aspx and about_abuse.aspx fetched 2026-11-03)free vpn 10 d ago
No comments yet - be the first. Posting runs a short proof-of-work in your browser (anti-spam), no account needed.