Mullvad VPN
The most honest VPN on the internet, and in 2026 still the one this industry is measured against: numbered accounts, cash or Monero accepted, open-source client
Gen Digital. Same network as AVG/HMA variants; 2020 Avast data-selling scandal (Jumpshot) permanently stained the family name.
by the vpncomparison editorial desk · review version 2 · prose updated 2026-09-28 · facts as of 2026-09-28 · how we verify
Avast SecureLine VPN is a commercial service owned by Gen Digital, the conglomerate behind Avast, AVG, and HMA. Despite offering a 7-day trial, its reputation is irreparably damaged by a 2020 scandal in which Avast sold users’ browsing data through Jumpshot - a practice confirmed by the FTC, which fined the company $16.5 million in 2024. This is not a privacy-first tool; it’s a product from a company caught profiting from user surveillance.
Avast has no verifiable logging claim, no warrant canary, and zero independent audits. Its privacy practices were directly contradicted by evidence: in 2024, the FTC confirmed Avast harvested and sold detailed browsing data via Jumpshot, despite marketing itself as a privacy protector. Jurisdiction in Czechia offers no special privacy benefits, and being under Gen Digital - a company with a documented history of data monetization - further undermines trust. Promises of privacy here are meaningless.
Pricing details for Avast SecureLine VPN are not publicly disclosed in a reliable, structured way - no clear intro or renewal rates, contract length, or refund window are confirmed. This lack of transparency is a red flag. Without knowing the renewal cost or total 3-year expense, you risk being locked into an overpriced, long-term subscription. The only certainty is a 7-day trial; beyond that, financial terms remain deliberately obscure.
Avast SecureLine VPN lacks essential privacy features: no kill switch, no split tunneling, no multihop, no Tor support, and no dedicated IP. It does not support P2P file sharing or streaming unblocking. With no verified server count or country coverage, and no evidence of open-source transparency, the service appears technically outdated. We have not conducted performance tests, but given the company’s history and minimal feature set, technical excellence is unlikely.
Avast SecureLine is 100% owned by Gen Digital, a corporation with a proven history of exploiting user data. The 2020 Jumpshot scandal - exposed by PCMag and Motherboard and confirmed by a 2024 FTC settlement - revealed that Avast sold granular browsing behavior from millions of users, including those using its privacy products. This isn’t a mistake; it’s a business model. With no accountability measures or transparency improvements since, trust is not justified.
Avast SecureLine VPN offers no obfuscation methods and has no known capability to bypass advanced censorship in countries like China, Iran, or Russia. Without tools like obfuscated servers or protocol-level stealth, it will likely be detected and blocked on heavily filtered networks. If you’re in a censored region or need to evade surveillance, this service will not protect you - choose a provider with proven obfuscation and a real no-logs record.
Avoid Avast SecureLine VPN. It’s operated by a company fined $16.5 million for selling user browsing data, with no proof of privacy protections and no transparency on pricing or logging. This is not a tool for privacy - it’s a product from a company that monetized your data. Real privacy requires trust, and Avast burned that years ago. Choose an independent, audited provider instead.
| Intro price | see provider site |
|---|
See the 3-year total next to the marketing number: true-cost calculator →
affiliate status not verified yet
If we sign up for this program, every link here becomes rel="nofollow sponsored" and this box stays. Until then our links are plain redirects with zero tracking. Ranking logic physically cannot read affiliate fields - here is the proof.
Before you pay: check the renewal price, the refund window, and whether a cheaper or free path covers your use case - the honest checklist.
Based on our checks as of 2026-09-28: Avast SecureLine VPN scores 4/10 in our weighted review. We logged no red flags. User reports, ownership and the incident record are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.
A basic VPN with no kill switch, P2P, streaming support, or advanced privacy features. Server count, locations, and protocols are undisclosed. You get a product from a company caught selling user data - functionality is minimal and trust is unjustified.
Renewal pricing and long-term costs are not publicly disclosed. Without transparent pricing, you risk sudden, steep increases after any trial or initial term. This lack of clarity is a common tactic to trap users financially.
There is no evidence - only a history of logging and selling data. The FTC confirmed in 2024 that Avast harvested and monetized browsing data via Jumpshot. Any claim of privacy is directly contradicted by legal findings and corporate behavior.
No. Avast SecureLine offers no obfuscation or censorship-circumvention tools. It will likely be blocked on networks that actively filter VPNs. Do not rely on it in high-risk or heavily censored environments.
Anonymous payment options are not listed. The service accepts fiat but does not disclose support for cryptocurrency or cash. Given Avast’s history of data monetization, anonymous payment would be ironic - but it’s not offered.
Given Gen Digital’s track record, a shutdown wouldn’t be surprising. Users would lose service with little warning. Past behavior suggests user interests are secondary to profit - don’t expect continuity or transparency in a shutdown scenario.
For real privacy, avoid free tiers from data-harvesting companies. Consider flat-priced, independent providers with public audits and no corporate ties to antivirus data brokers. Some offer low-cost plans without hidden monetization - research beyond the affiliate-funded “top 10” lists.
The most honest VPN on the internet, and in 2026 still the one this industry is measured against: numbered accounts, cash or Monero accepted, open-source client
The anti-affiliate champion candidate holds up: no affiliate program (stated out loud on the homepage), flat honest pricing, quarterly warrant canary, annual th
The best-evidenced no-logs claim in the business - twice tested in US courts (2016, 2018) and twice found to have nothing - plus the cheapest long-term renewal
No comments yet - be the first. Posting runs a short proof-of-work in your browser (anti-spam), no account needed.