Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) vs VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment): which wins in 2026?

Head-to-head on the facts that decide the purchase: real prices in the provider's own unit, minimum, KYC, proof, payment and terms - every number sourced in the linked reviews.

Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app)

no logging claim at all · United States

3.1of 10

A free, fast, one-tap encryption tool that is deliberately NOT an anonymity VPN - judge it as such. Cloudflare's own docs say the quiet part: WARP collects 'limited DNS query and traffic data (excluding payload)', keeps your app installation ID, transfer counters, average speed, and 'aggregate amount of traffic by website and by region', and hands your real IP to any site that runs on Cloudflare - which, on today's web, is a large share of destinations. There is no country selection and no streaming/geoblocking use case (AndroidPolice: 'WARP isn't a traditional VPN... doesn't provide location masking'). What you get for free is excellent: strong MASQUE encryption with post-quantum cryptography, one-tap setup, no account, no data cap, real protection on hostile Wi-Fi, and - per its China-using fans - often the most stable tunnel in censored networks, though India and Russia have blocked it by name. It replaces trust in your ISP with trust in a US advertising-adjacent CDN giant. For hiding from your school, your coffee-shop Wi-Fi or throttling: excellent. For hiding from Cloudflare itself, trackers, or a state: the wrong tool.

slight edge

VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment)

promise only (no proof) · Japan - web site hosted at the University of Tsukuba campus (Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573), administrator Daiyuu Nobori, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Tsukuba; the volunteer relays themselves are distributed worldwide and 'are not placed in the campus'; aggregated log servers are owned and managed by SoftEther Corporation, the joint research partner (about_us.aspx and about_abuse.aspx fetched 2026-11-03)

3.7of 10$0 /mo

VPN Gate is a legitimate, transparently-run academic experiment that is genuinely free forever and genuinely useful for one thing: getting past government firewalls from censored networks, which is exactly why its users are concentrated in China, Iran and Russia. It is also one of the least privacy-friendly VPNs in existence - by its own published policy it keeps 3+ months of connection logs including your real IP and the destination hostnames you visit, hands them to police, prosecutors, lawyers and courts, and publishes a live feed of connections; every volunteer relay additionally sniffs two weeks of TCP/IP headers on untrusted hardware. Speeds and uptime are luck-of-the-draw because ~100 volunteer relays (measured 2026-11-03, against a '6000+' marketing line) come and go, and users in censored countries report the network is actively blocked. Use it as a free research tool or emergency censorship escape hatch - never for anything you would not be comfortable having logged and disclosed.

Short answer: VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment) wins overall (3.7/10 vs 3.1/10). Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) is the better pick if you care most about censorship resistance. Facts checked 2026-11-07.

The facts

Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment)
Overall score (0-10)3.13.7
Privacy & proof
Logging claimCollects 'limited DNS query and traffic data (excluding payload)': app installation ID,…We always keep VPN Connections Logs of VPN Gate Public VPN Relay Servers for three or…
Logging evidenceno logging claim at allpromise only (no proof)
AuditsunknownGuido Vranken (independent security researcher) 2018
JurisdictionUnited States
Japan - web site hosted at the University of Tsukuba campus… moreJapan - web site hosted at the University of Tsukuba campus (Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573), administrator Daiyuu Nobori, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Tsukuba; the volunteer relays themselves are distributed worldwide and 'are not placed in the campus'; aggregated log servers are owned and managed by SoftEther Corporation, the joint research partner (about_us.aspx and about_abuse.aspx fetched 2026-11-03)
Ownerunknownunknown
Money
Intro priceunknown$0 /mo
Renewal pricenot publishednot published
Anonymous paymentfiatunknown
Account
Personal infonone
none - 'No user registration is required' (FAQ); anonymous c… morenone - 'No user registration is required' (FAQ); anonymous connections are explicitly accepted
KindFree VPNsFree VPNs
Facts checked2026-09-292026-11-03

Score breakdown

Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) leads on censorship resistance (+4) · VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment) leads on privacy & logging (+3).

Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app)VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment)
Privacy & logging
0
3
+3
Ownership & track record
2
2
·
Security
5
5
·
Censorship resistance
4
0
+4
Honest value
7
7
·
Ease of use
5.5
5.5
·

Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) at a glance

++ What holds up

  • Free with no data cap and no account (App Store listing + operator docs)
  • Strong modern crypto: MASQUE tunneling with post-quantum encryption (WARP modes docs)
  • Genuinely fast - users consistently report WARP beating commercial VPNs and even beating Psiphon/Lantern in China (r/VPN, r/chinalife)
  • One-tap simplicity on Android/iOS/desktop, no account, works from quick settings (AndroidPolice hands-on)
  • Split tunneling and multiple modes (DNS-only DoH/DoT vs full tunnel)
  • Backed by one of the world's largest networks - rarely down; encodes no ads and sells no data per its policy

-- What to watch

  • Metadata collection is the documented default: installation ID, transfer volumes, speeds, and aggregate traffic by website/region (WARP privacy docs)
  • No anonymity from Cloudflare: your real IP is disclosed to sites on Cloudflare's own network (HN voices + docs)
  • No location masking or country switching - cannot unblock geo-content (AndroidPolice)
  • Torrent-hostile in practice: detected by trackers/datacenters, no port forwarding (r/Piracy)
  • Trust model swaps ISP for a US company with PRISM-era baggage (HN debate); no warrant canary
  • Blocked by name in some jurisdictions (India, Russia per user reports); UX criticisms after feature changes (coywolf)

Full Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) review →

VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment) at a glance

audit open source

++ What holds up

  • Free forever by design - the FAQ explicitly promises it will 'NEVER be a paying service', and there are no data caps or device limits (Security.org 2026)
  • No account, no registration, no payment - anonymous connections accepted (FAQ, fetched 2026-11-03)
  • Rare transparency: the anti-abuse policy states exactly what is logged, and a live anonymized connection-log feed updates every 60 seconds on the site
  • Four protocols per relay (SoftEther SSL-VPN, L2TP/IPsec, OpenVPN, MS-SSTP) usable from stock OS clients without installing anything on Mac/iOS/Android
  • Fully open-source stack (SoftEther VPN, Apache-2.0/GPL on GitHub) with an academic pedigree - NSDI'14 paper by the University of Tsukuba authors
  • Purpose-built censorship resistance: distributed volunteer IPs, mirror sites for when the main site is blocked, and 23.67 billion cumulative connections from 239 countries (counters fetched 2026-11-03)

-- What to watch

  • Extensive logging by policy: 3+ months of connection logs including source IP and destination HTTP/HTTPS hostnames (FQDNs), disclosed to police, prosecutors, lawyers and courts on request
  • Packet logs (all TCP/IP headers) kept 2+ weeks on each volunteer's machine - you are routing traffic through strangers' computers that the project itself warns to treat cautiously
  • Aggregated log servers are 'owned, operated, and managed by SoftEther Corporation', a commercial joint-research partner, not the university
  • Tiny real network vs marketing: 101 running relays in 8 countries via the live API on 2026-11-03, most in Japan and South Korea (Security.org concurs: 'Most of the servers are in Japan and South Korea')
  • Unreliable performance and availability: dynamic IPs, servers 'appear and disappear at any time', and community reports of US servers that 'never work' and speeds that are 'too slow'
  • No native apps outside Windows, no kill switch/split tunneling/multihop, and no effective obfuscation - forum staff concede counter-detection features are 'completely useless' against modern DPI (March 2026)

Full VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment) review →

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) or VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment)?

VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment) publishes a price ($0 /mo); Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) is free (no comparable price exists) - compare what each one takes instead of money.

Which has better logging evidence, Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) or VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment)?

VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment) has the stronger logging evidence; Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) makes no no-logs claim at all.

Which renewal price is honest, Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) or VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment)?

Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) is free - there is no renewal price to hide; the honest question is what the "free" is funded with. See the linked reviews.

Which needs less KYC, Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) or VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment)?

At least one provider does not document its KYC policy - treat it as unknown, not as "no KYC".

Which has the longer track record?

VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment) has the longer track record (since 2013).

Scores and facts: meta-reviews with dated sources - Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1 app) · VPN Gate (public volunteer relay experiment). Method: how we verify. More: all providers compared · all head-to-heads.