Mullvad VPN
The most honest VPN on the internet, and in 2026 still the one this industry is measured against: numbered accounts, cash or Monero accepted, open-source client
Ziff Davis-owned; appears to have been quietly folded into StrongVPN/Encrypt.me marketing. Status needs re-check.
by the vpncomparison editorial desk · review version 2 · prose updated 2026-09-28 · facts as of 2026-09-28 · how we verify
SaferVPN is a commercial VPN service with an unclear current status - evidence suggests it has been quietly folded into StrongVPN or Encrypt.me under Ziff Davis ownership. It operates out of the United States, a jurisdiction with invasive surveillance laws. No verified data confirms its ongoing operations, logging policies, or feature set. Proceed with extreme caution: this provider may no longer exist as a standalone service.
There is no verifiable logging claim or evidence for SaferVPN. No audits, warrant canary, or transparency reports are available. It operates under U.S. jurisdiction - an Five Eyes member with extensive surveillance powers - raising serious privacy concerns. Without a proven no-logs policy or third-party validation, user data could be subject to government requests. Any privacy assurances are purely speculative and untested in court.
No current pricing data is available for SaferVPN. Historical records indicate an affiliate program once offered commissions, suggesting a subscription model existed. However, the site now blocks access via Cloudflare, making verification impossible. Without transparent pricing, refund terms, or contract details, any financial commitment carries high risk. Assume all plans use aggressive renewal markups typical of the industry.
No confirmed features are documented for SaferVPN. There is no evidence of a kill switch, obfuscation, multihop, or split tunneling. Support for P2P, streaming, or specific protocols is unverified. Server count, country coverage, and device limits are unknown. Given the lack of technical disclosures and no open-source components, performance claims cannot be assessed. This service offers no provable advantages over modern alternatives.
Ownership of SaferVPN is not publicly verifiable, though evidence links it to Ziff Davis, a media conglomerate with a history of consolidating digital brands. No incidents or breaches are documented, but the absence of transparency reports and operational opacity raises red flags. Data quality is rated as "reported," meaning facts are unverified. The folding of SaferVPN into other brands suggests abandonment rather than active stewardship.
SaferVPN does not offer any documented obfuscation methods such as obfs4 or domain fronting. Without such tools, it cannot bypass deep packet inspection used in highly censored regions like China, Iran, or Russia. Given the lack of technical details and U.S. jurisdiction, this service is unsuitable for users facing state-level censorship. Use a proven tool designed for such environments instead.
Do not sign up for SaferVPN. Its operational status is unconfirmed, it lacks transparency, and it appears to have been absorbed into another service. With no evidence for privacy claims and ties to a large media conglomerate, trust is unjustified. The money trail shows past use of affiliate marketing, common in low-trust providers - many review sites likely promoted it for commission.
| Intro price | see provider site |
|---|
See the 3-year total next to the marketing number: true-cost calculator →
affiliate status not verified yet via unknown · published terms: not verifiable today - own affiliate page (archived 2017-04-17) advertised 'Earn up to $38 for every customer you refer' with $50 minimum payout; a 2021 capture shows SaferVPN linking to the Ziff Davis Post Affiliate Pro portal (affiliate.strongvpn.com)
safervpn.com serves Cloudflare 403 to this server; the program's current existence and rates are unverifiable from here.
If we sign up for this program, every link here becomes rel="nofollow sponsored" and this box stays. Until then our links are plain redirects with zero tracking. Ranking logic physically cannot read affiliate fields - here is the proof.
Before you pay: check the renewal price, the refund window, and whether a cheaper or free path covers your use case - the honest checklist.
Based on our checks as of 2026-09-28: SaferVPN scores 4.9/10 in our weighted review. We logged no red flags. User reports, ownership and the incident record are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.
Unknown. The service appears defunct, with no accessible features, apps, or support. Historical data suggests basic VPN functionality, but nothing is verifiable today.
Pricing is no longer accessible. The renewal cost cannot be determined, and long-term subscriptions carry high risk without refund guarantees.
There is no evidence. No logging policy, audit, or court test supports a no-logs claim. It remains entirely unproven.
No. SaferVPN offers no known obfuscation tools and is not designed to bypass state-level firewalls.
Unknown. No current payment methods are listed. Cryptocurrency support is unconfirmed, and KYC practices are not disclosed.
Given it likely already has, user data could have been transferred to Ziff Davis or deleted without notice - no transparency report exists to confirm.
Consider a flat-priced independent provider like Mullvad or a reputable free tier like Proton VPN’s free plan - both with audited policies and proven independence.
The most honest VPN on the internet, and in 2026 still the one this industry is measured against: numbered accounts, cash or Monero accepted, open-source client
The anti-affiliate champion candidate holds up: no affiliate program (stated out loud on the homepage), flat honest pricing, quarterly warrant canary, annual th
The best-evidenced no-logs claim in the business - twice tested in US courts (2016, 2018) and twice found to have nothing - plus the cheapest long-term renewal
No comments yet - be the first. Posting runs a short proof-of-work in your browser (anti-spam), no account needed.